Writing To Win Photo Gallery
Note: The 'Writing To Win' symposium, sponsored by the Center for Excellence in Advocacy, was held March 9-10, 2007.
See the news story about this event.
Other Pages: 1 2
Judges Duane Benton, Deanell Reece Tacha, and
Mary Beck Briscoe discuss what appellate
judges expect from advocates.
Mary Beck Briscoe discuss what appellate
judges expect from advocates.
Symposium attendees listen to U.S. Court of
Appeals judges.
Appeals judges.
Keynote speaker Professor Mary Beth Beazley
discusses blueprints for legal analysis and
case descriptions.
discusses blueprints for legal analysis and
case descriptions.
Judges J. Thomas Martin, Janice Russell
(standing), Nancy Parrish and Donald Noland
explain what trial judges expect in motions
and briefs.
(standing), Nancy Parrish and Donald Noland
explain what trial judges expect in motions
and briefs.
Appellate court law clerks David Y. Stevens,
Daniel L. Real, and Eunice C. Peters share
insights about what law clerks and research
attorneys expect in advocacy writing.
Daniel L. Real, and Eunice C. Peters share
insights about what law clerks and research
attorneys expect in advocacy writing.
Law students Claudia Weaver, Andrea Rusche,
and Bud Dale discuss the value of amicus
curiae briefs as teaching tools.
and Bud Dale discuss the value of amicus
curiae briefs as teaching tools.
Law students Matthew Ballard, Kelly Kauffman,
and Karen Quintelier share thoughts about how
their moot court experience has helped them
learn to write effective appellate briefs.
and Karen Quintelier share thoughts about how
their moot court experience has helped them
learn to write effective appellate briefs.
Professor Sean O'Brien discusses the use of
storytelling techniques in persuasive legal
writing.
storytelling techniques in persuasive legal
writing.
Stan Sexton advocates the teaching of the use
of technology in legal writing.
of technology in legal writing.
Symposium attendees listen attentively to a
panel discussion.
panel discussion.
Other Pages: 1 2
