Washburn Law Journal

Recent Blog Post

An Immigrant Contextualizes the George Floyd Verdict

Professor Rory Bahadur | April 24, 2021 | Read this blog post

Summary: The conviction of Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd is potentially a distraction from the depth and pervasiveness of systemic racism in this country. That trial resulted in just one conviction in a country where over 10 million arrests occur every year. While it may be important as a symbol of change, it is empirically less significant as an actual metric of racial reform. Examining post-colonial Caribbean politics and the emotional distraction techniques employed by those seeking office to shift the populace’s focus from the reality and magnitude of corrupt governing and the seeming hopelessness of reform attempts, illustrates the danger that putting too much stock in the Chauvin conviction poses to true racial reform.

Recent Comment

Instability Ahead! Kansas Parents Should Proceed with Caution: Why a De Facto Parentage Balancing Test Is the Next Logical Step After In re Parentage of M.F., 475 P.3d 642 (Kan. 2020)

Rylee M. Broyles | September 29, 2021 | Read this comment

Summary: In In re M.F., the Kansas Supreme Court finally laid to rest the confusion surrounding the issue of whether written co-parenting agreements are required to recognize legal parentage of a nonbiological parent in an Artificial Reproductive Technology (“ART”) case. Its proclamation: written co-parenting agreements are not required. This clarification—as necessary as it was—left in its wake a bigger question: what is required to establish legal parentage for nonbiological parents? This unresolved question should be answered in the form of a de facto parent balancing test. Such a test will provide Kansas courts with the stability of predetermined elements while still giving them the flexibility to consider the totality of the circumstances in an area of the law where every case is unique.

Preferred Citation: Rylee M. Broyles, Instability Ahead!  Kansas Parents Should Proceed with Caution: Why a De Facto Parentage Balancing Test Is the Next Logical Step After In re Parentage of M.F., 475 P.3d 642 (Kan. 2020), 61 Washburn L.J. Online  (2021), https://washburnlaw.edu/wljonline/broyles-instability-ahead.

The Washburn Law Journal welcomes unsolicited manuscripts for publication consideration. Note: The Washburn Law Journal does not typically accept submissions from students.

All manuscripts should be double-spaced, notes should be in footnote form, and citations should conform to The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (21st ed.). A copy of the manuscript should also be available as a Microsoft Word file (preferred).

Please direct manuscripts to the attention of the Articles Editor at journalarticles@washburnlaw.edu.

Washburn Law Journal also accepts submissions via Icon: ExpressO service. (through March 31, 2021).

Subscription Inquiries

If you have questions concerning subscriptions or non-received issues, please contact the Washburn Law Journal Secretary at (785) 670-1692 or via e-mail at journalclaims@washburnlaw.edu.

Washburn Law Journal
Washburn University School of Law
1700 SW College Ave.
Topeka, KS 66621
(785) 670-1683
journal@washburnlaw.edu
(general correspondence)
journaleditor@washburnlaw.edu
(Editor-in-Chief)

Short URL for this page:
http://washburnlaw.edu/wlj

The American Dream: Reality or Myth? Symposium

Thursday, November 4, 2021 (via Zoom).

43rd Foulston Siefkin Lecture
Photograph: Nadine Stossen.

Washburn University School of Law
and the Washburn Law Journal
proudly present

Nadine Strossen
John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law, Emerita
New York Law School

"Why Should Hatemongers and Extremists Have Free Speech Rights?"

Thursday – March 18, 2021
12:30 p.m. – via Zoom

Artificial Rights? Symposium, Thursday, November 5, 2020
Machine Rights
Keynote Address by
Katherine Gaudry
Machine Wrongs
Volume 61 Editor-in-Chief, Board, and Staff

See the Washburn Law Journal Volume 61 Board of Editors and Staff Members.